Tagged: Missouri Supreme Court

Pages

Morning round-up
9:28 am
Fri September 2, 2011

Morning headlines: Friday, September 2, 2011

Credit (via Wikimedia Commons/FEMA Photo Library)
A storm warning siren in Kansas. St. Louis County will conduct tests of its new $7 million warning siren system on Monday.

St. Louis County to test new warning system on Mon.

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reports the county will test the new $7 million warning siren system at 11 a.m. Monday. The county's emergency operations center will monitor closely to make sure the 180 speakers work properly.

Read more
Missouri Supreme Court
5:41 pm
Thu September 1, 2011

Attorney, 2 judges nominated for Mo. Supreme Court

Credit (via Flickr/david_shane)
Three finalists have been announced today to fill a vacancy on the Missouri Supreme Court.

A special commission that nominates candidates for the Missouri Supreme Court has given Gov. Jay Nixon the choice of an attorney, a trial judge or an appeals court judge to fill a vacancy.

The three finalists announced Thursday for the state's highest court are:

Read more
Law / NorthSide Development Project
1:50 pm
Tue August 2, 2011

Mo. Supreme Court upholds constitutionality of tax credit that could affect NorthSide project

Credit (St. Louis Public Radio)
Developer Paul McKee.

In March, the Missouri Supreme Court heard a case regarding the constitutionality of a state tax credit which, as we stated then, enabled St. Louis developer Paul McKee to buy up several tracts of land on the city’s north side.

At that time, McKee had received $28 million in tax credits for his NorthSide project and St. Louis Mayor Francis Slay signed off on the project in February.

Today, the Missouri Supreme Court said that the tax credit is, indeed, constitutional.

When the case was heard in March, attorney Irene Smith, who represents plaintiffs and North St. Louis residents Barbara Manzara and Keith Marquard,  said that the tax credit violates the state constitution by giving state tax dollars to private business interests.

The Supreme Court cited a couple different reasons for their decision.

Read more

Pages